Stylogeny in the style of Biobrand (Organic Biotech CGI)

Try

Digital native · 2021–present · North America, Global / networked

Biobrand (Organic Biotech CGI)

Also known as Biobrand aesthetic, Biobranding

The visual language of biotech and biomaterial start-ups: rendered cells, coral-like structures, terrariums and mycelial growth become a single glossy product metaphor, set apart on a quiet ground beside restrained sans or serif information type. Kazior frames it as replacing the cold look of Silicon Valley tech minimalism with squishy, bodily, living forms.

Make something in this style Get advice in this style Mix it with another style

A translucent, irregular bubble-like form contains clusters of pale green spheres within glossy pink and blue membranes. It floats against an off-white background above the widely spaced word “NIVRA.”
AI-generated by Stylogeny from the style’s design choices. Not a real or historical work.

Use it with care

Do not let a beautiful organic render stand in for evidence: Kazior describes the idealisation of microbes as a speculative, profit-driven proposition and cautions against believing it will solve environmental problems; he also notes that biotech firms simplify complex science to persuade consumers and investors, and describes Seed's transparency as carefully crafted. Avoid green-nature or medical-efficacy implications you cannot substantiate.

01

How it works

  • Render one intricate biological object, such as a cell, orb, coral or tissue, as the isolated hero of the surface.
  • Surround the render with generous empty ground, white or black, so the organism reads as a precious specimen.
  • Keep the interface and labels quiet: small, factual type in a restrained sans or serif, on flat fields.
  • Animate growth, bubbling or unfurling slowly, so the product seems to be cultivated rather than manufactured.
  • Pair lab-like information, such as ingredients, process and data, in layers beside the image.

A network of biotech brand identities and websites in US practice, named as a trend by John Kazior in AIGA Eye on Design on 2 June 2022 ('Tech minimalism is out: welcome to the squishy microbial world of the biobrand'), which discusses Geltor, Forager, Seed and Ginkgo Bioworks among others. Documented examples include &Walsh's Geltor identity (reported 30 September 2021), Libre's Forager identity (commissioned 2021) and Image Conscious Studios' Auregen launch (late 2023). The start year marks the earliest documented examples, not an invention.

02

Its design choices

From Stylogeny’s vocabulary of design choices: defining choices make the style, characteristic ones are usual, occasional ones turn up now and then.

Layout & composition
Space & hierarchy
Typography
Colour
Form & shape
Surface & texture
Ornament
Imagery
Medium & production
Tone & intent
Avoids
Abundant decoration, Horror vacui, Hard offset shadow, Ornamented display, Halftone & Ben-Day dots, Angular & zigzag

Palette

  • #f6f4ef
  • #0d0f0f
  • #8fb996
  • #e6a8a0
  • #5c8fa8
  • #c9b7e0

Typefaces

  • Louize (serif) and Basile Grotesque Pro, as reported in It's Nice That's coverage of the Geltor identity

    2021

  • Small factual sans-serif labels under a serif product name, as on the Geltor HumaColl21 packaging

Known for

  • &Walsh, Geltor identity (reported 30 September 2021)

    3D orbs holding botanical and marine-inspired worlds, product packaging and a restrained typographic system; Jessica Walsh creative director

  • Libre, Forager by Ecovative identity and website (identity commissioned 2021)

    pattern, colour and typography system, with website animation of mycelial networks forming a sneaker as described by AIGA in 2022

  • Image Conscious Studios, Auregen identity and website (launched late 2023)

    bioprinted-style scientific renders, organic cellular textures and fluid motion; the case-study text does not describe the ground, but the studio's image file shows a translucent form on black

03

Make something in this style

Say what you need, and Stylogeny’s image studio draws it from Biobrand (Organic Biotech CGI)’s design choices and checks it against them. It takes about a minute, and you get a link to share.

Rule out a choice, read the prompt, or blend in another style: take this brief to Mix styles.

04

Where it comes from, and what it’s close to

Before it

The style it grew out of, and the styles it borrowed from.

Nothing earlier is recorded: in the atlas it is a starting point.

This style Biobrand (Organic Biotech CGI) 2021–present · North America, Global / networked

After it

The styles that grew out of it.

No later style in the atlas grew out of it yet.

Alike in its design choices

Styles that make many of the same choices, related or not, besides those above.

05

Often taken for

Biobrand has no real works recorded yet, so these are its nearest styles by its choices alone, with the choices that tell them apart.

  • Frutiger Aero 2004–2013 · the styles 65% alike

    Frutiger Aero is one of Biobrand’s nearest styles by choices; no real work of either fits the other better.

    Choices that tell Biobrand and Frutiger Aero apart
    Choice Biobrand Frutiger Aero
    Isolated object defining occasional
    Humanist sans — defining
    Generous white space defining occasional
    Analogous harmony — characteristic
    Dark ground characteristic —

    No shared descent in the atlas: they reached these choices separately.

  • Y2K Futurism 1997–2005 · the styles 63% alike

    Y2K Futurism is one of Biobrand’s nearest styles by choices; no real work of either fits the other better.

    Choices that tell Biobrand and Y2K Futurism apart
    Choice Biobrand Y2K Futurism
    Humanist & Garalde serif characteristic avoids
    Chrome & 3D render occasional defining
    Generous white space defining —
    Iridescent & holographic — characteristic
    Dark ground characteristic —

    No shared descent in the atlas: they reached these choices separately.

  • Claymorphism & Soft 3D 2020–present · the styles 62% alike

    Claymorphism & Soft 3D is one of Biobrand’s nearest styles by choices; no real work of either fits the other better.

    Choices that tell Biobrand and Claymorphism apart
    Choice Biobrand Claymorphism
    Biomorphic curves defining occasional
    Pastel — characteristic
    Dark ground characteristic —
    Full polychrome — characteristic
    Layered information characteristic —

    No shared descent in the atlas: they reached these choices separately.

  • Glassmorphism 2020–present · the styles 55% alike

    Glassmorphism is one of Biobrand’s nearest styles by choices; no real work of either fits the other better.

    Choices that tell Biobrand and Glassmorphism apart
    Choice Biobrand Glassmorphism
    Isolated object defining —
    Analogous harmony — characteristic
    3D render defining occasional
    Cards & bento tiles — characteristic
    Generous white space defining occasional

    No shared descent in the atlas: they reached these choices separately.

— means the choice isn’t among the style’s recorded choices. Critics recorded each work’s choices with the styles’ descriptions in view, so this shows whether the descriptions hold together, not proof that they are right.

07

Sources

  1. John Kazior, 'Tech minimalism is out: welcome to the squishy microbial world of the biobrand', AIGA Eye on Design, 2 June 2022: https://eyeondesign.aiga.org/tech-minimalism-is-out-welcome-to-the-squishy-microbial-world-of-the-biobrand/
  2. &Walsh, Geltor case study: https://andwalsh.com/work/all/geltor/
  3. Ruby Boddington, It's Nice That, 30 September 2021: https://www.itsnicethat.com/news/andwalsh-geltor-graphic-design-300921
  4. Libre, Forager case study: https://libredesign.com/case-studies/forager/
  5. Image Conscious Studios, Auregen case study: https://www.icscreative.com/our-work/auregen/

How Stylogeny researches and checks a style: where the facts come from.